Published on December 1, 2006
December
1, 2006
Via
Federal Express & Edgar
Russell
Mancuso, Branch Chief
Securities
and Exchange Commission
Division
of Corporation Finance
100
F
Street, N.E.
Washington,
D.C. 20549-0406
Re: |
SRKP
7, Inc.
|
Form SB-2 |
File No. 333-137208 |
Filed on September 8, 2006 |
Dear
Mr.
Mancuso:
This
is
in response to your comment letter dated October 4, 2006.
Prospectus
cover
1.
|
Given
that there is no market for your securities, please disclose the
price at
which your selling shareholders will sell their securities. See Schedule
A
Item 16 of the Securities Act and Regulation S-B Item 501 (a)(9)(iv).
We
will not object if you also disclose that the selling shareholders
will
sell at prevailing market prices or privately negotiated prices after
the
shares are quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board. Please also modify your
“Plan
of Distribution” disclosure
accordingly.
|
Company
Response
We
have
made the suggested changes on the Prospectus cover and Plan of Distribution.
Prospectus
Forepart
2.
|
Please
avoid reliance on defined terms like those in parentheses and quotation
marks. If the terms are clear from context, the definitions arc
unnecessary. If they are not clear, please revise for
clarity.
|
Company
Response
We
have
made the appropriate changes throughout the Registration Statement.
Russell
Mancuso
December 1,
2006
Page
2
Prospectus
Summary, page 1
3.
|
The
introductory paragraph to your summary states that the summary is
not
complete. A summary, by its very nature, does not and is not required
to
contain all of the detailed information that is in the prospectus.
However, if you have elected to include a summary in your prospectus,
it
must be complete. Do you mean to say that, because this is a summary,
it
may not contain all of the information that is important to your
investors? Delete the reference to an incomplete summary from your
prospectus.
|
Company
Response
We
have
deleted the reference.
Private
Placement, page 2
4.
|
With
a view toward clarified disclosure, please tell us why you issued
the
placement agent two separate warrants with apparently the same
terms.
|
Company
Response
Since
the
warrants were identical, we have clarified the disclosure. For internal
purposes, the placement agent requested two separate warrants.
Risk
Factors, page 5
5.
|
Please
add a separate risk factor to highlight the going concern language
in your
auditor’s report. Disclose the reason for the language and its material
effects, including its effect on your access to capital at market
rates.
|
Company
Response
We
have
added the risk factor as requested.
We
depend on certain key scientific personnel . . . . page 8
6.
|
Revise
to quantify the amount of time that Dr. Kovach devotes to your
business.
|
Company
Response
We
have
indicated that Dr. Kovach generally devotes a minimum of twenty hours a week
to
the Company.
Russell
Mancuso
December 1,
2006
Page 3
7.
|
In
a separate risk factor, address the risks associated with the fact
that
these key personnel are involved in other business activities and
may face
a conflict in selecting between their other business interests and
you, as
discussed on page 40.
|
Company
Response
We
have
added a risk factor as requested.
We
expect to rely heavily on third parties for the conduct of clinical trials
. . .
. page 8
8.
|
Revise
to clarify what steps you will need to achieve before you begin conducting
preclinical studies and clinical trials in
humans.
|
Company
Response
We
have
indicated the steps required.
If
our
products were derived from tissue or other samples from a patient . . . . page
13
9.
|
In
an appropriate section of your document, please disclose when the
negotiations in the second sentence began. Also disclose the status
of the
negotiations and the principal hurdles that remain before an agreement
can
be reached.
|
Company
Response
The
agreement with the University has been completed and will be executed in
December 2006.
10.
|
Revise
to clarify whose obligation it will be to obtain the necessary consents.
Also clarify why the consents might not be
enforceable.
|
Company
Response
We
have
made the appropriate clarifications.
11.
|
Please
clarify why there is a material risk of willful misconduct. Does
your
supplier have a history of such
conduct?
|
Company
Response
There
is
no such risk, and we have eliminated the reference.
Russell
Mancuso
December 1,
2006
Page 4
If
we
fail to maintain effective internal controls, page 17
12.
|
We
note the disclosure in the first sentence that you “may” have weaknesses.
Please disclose the reasons for the
doubt.
|
Company
Response
There
is
no such weakness and we have eliminated the risk factor.
Standards
for compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act . . . page
17
13.
|
We
note your belief that the compliance dates for you will first apply
to
your annual report for fiscal 2008. Your disclosure on page F-11,
however,
indicates that you will be required to comply with these requirements
with
your year ending December 31, 2007. Please revise as appropriate
to
reconcile.
|
Company
Response
We
have
made the changes so as to be consistent.
Forward-Looking
Statements, page 19
14.
|
Please
note that Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section
21E of
the Exchange Act of 1934, do not apply to issuers of penny stock.
Please
remove the references to these
sections.
|
Company
Response
We
have
deleted the reference to the two sections.
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis, page 24
Critical
Accounting Policies - Stock-Based Compensation, page 25
15.
|
We
note in the last sentence of this section that you did not have any
stock
options or warrants issued or outstanding at December 31, 2005. This
discussion should be expanded to include the stock options granted
on June
30, 2006 as disclosed in Note 3 on page F-l3 of the interim financial
statements and the impact of SFAS 123(R) on these
issuances.
|
Russell
Mancuso
December 1,
2006
Page 5
Company
Response
We
have
revised the disclosure in critical accounting policies with respect to
stock-based compensation to expand it to include the stock options granted
on
June 30, 2006 and the impact of SFAS 123(R) on these issuances.
Results
of Operations, page 26
16.
|
Since
Lixte has not generated revenue during the periods presented, discussion
of your plan of operation should be provided. Please revise the filing
to
comply with Item 303(a) of Regulation
S-B.
|
Company
Response
We
have
revised the disclosure to reflect a Plan of Operation.
Going
Concern, page 26
17.
|
Please
discuss your disclosed need for $2.3 million. We note your reference
to a
wet lab on page 6. It is unclear why this wet lab is necessary in
the
short term given your current operations. Also, will you need additional
property or employees to operate the lab? Are these costs included
in the
$2.3 million estimate?
|
Company
Response
We
have
made the disclosure as to the need for the $2.3 million.
Our
Company, page 28
18.
|
Please
state the date of your incorporation. If you were organized in connection
with affiliated companies, please describe those affiliations. Also,
describe any change in control.
|
Company
Response
We
have
added the date of incorporation and the organization of the affiliated companies
and a description of the change of control.
Russell
Mancuso
December 1,
2006
Page 6
Intellectual
Property, page 29
19.
|
Please
disclose when the negotiations mentioned in the third sentence began.
Also
disclose:
|
·
|
the
status of the negotiations;
|
·
|
the
principal hurdles that remain before an agreement can be reached;
and
|
·
|
the
scope of your rights to the intellectual property if no agreement
can be
reached.
|
Company
Response
The
Agreement will be executed in December 2006 and the Company does not believe
that the Agreement will not be executed.
20.
|
With
a view toward disclosure, please tell us how Dr. Kovach was involved
in
developing the intellectual property to the extent that he is
co-owner.
|
Company
Response
We
have
described his involvement.
Access
to Clinical Materials, page 29
21.
|
Please
expand your disclosure that “permission has been obtained” to identify the
entity who granted permission and the scope of such
permission.
|
Company
Response
We
have
expanded the disclosure.
22.
|
We
note your disclosure that you are negotiating an agreement to receive
tissue and blood samples from the Institute of Pathology in Germany.
Please revise to address how you currently obtain such
samples.
|
Company
Response
We
have
made the revisions.
Russell
Mancuso
December 1,
2006
Page 7
Research
and Development, page 31
Tissue
Acquisition, page 31
23.
|
Expand
your disclosure to clarify your obligations and potential liability,
if
any, under the regulatory requirements of the Office of Protection
of
Research Subjects in the United
States.
|
Company
Response
We
have
expanded our disclosure.
Product
Development, page 33
24.
|
Please
expand your disclosure to state at what stage your business activities
will become subject to FDA
regulation.
|
Company
Response
We
have
made the revisions.
Competition,
page 33
25.
|
Please
clarify whether any competitors have developed or are investigating
biomarkers for the same cancer that you are
studying.
|
Company
Response
We
have
made the clarifications.
Properties,
page 33
26.
|
Please
clarify the nature of your facility. Is this a leased office devoted
solely to your business in a commercial office building with multiple
unrelated tenants?
|
Company
Response
We
have
made the clarifications.
Russell
Mancuso
December 1,
2006
Page 8
Government
Regulation, page 34
27.
|
Please
clarify how each cited regulation affects your business. Also clarify
whether you are in compliance.
|
Company
Response
We
have
substantially changed the disclosure to reflect the regulatory scheme as it
specifically applies to our business.
Management,
page 35
28.
|
We
note the statement on page 37 that your director, Dr. Philip Palmedo,
has
served as a consultant to the government of Sudan. Please advise
us of the
nature and extent of the consultancy. Tell us whether Dr. Palmedo
has
served as a consultant to the government of Sudan during the period
he has
served as your director, and whether he continues to serve as a consultant
to the government of Sudan. Please also describe your past, current
and
anticipated contacts with Sudan, if any, whether through subsidiaries,
affiliates or other direct or indirect arrangements. We may have
further
comment.
|
Company
Response
Dr. Palmedo’s
work for the Government of Sudan occurred in 1980. The vehicle was a contract
between US AID and his firm, then called Energy/Development International,
was
retained to scope out a study of energy policy options for the country. It
involved a short visit to Khartoum and preparation of a report. As he recalls,
the project took less than six months. He has had no contact with Sudan since
that time. The firm, of which Dr. Palmedo is the non-executive Chairman of
the Board, is now called International Resources Group and information can
be
found at www.irgltd.com
29.
|
Please
clarify when Dr. Palmedo joined the
board.
|
Company
Response
We
have
so indicated - June 30, 2006.
Russell
Mancuso
December 1,
2006
Page 9
Scientific
Advisory Committee, page 37
30.
|
Please
describe the role of the committee. For example, how often does the
committee meet? On what matters have they deliberated and advised
you?
When did each member join the
committee?
|
Company
Response
We
have
expanded the discussion relating to the Committee.
31.
|
If
the committee members serve a management role, please provide full
disclosure regarding their background. See, for example, Regulation
S-B
Item 401(b). If the committee does not serve in a management role,
please
tell us why you have identified the committee in the management section
of
your prospectus.
|
Company
Response
The
committee does not serve any management function.
Executive
Compensation, page 38
32.
|
Please
provide disclosure for each person who served as your CEO or acted
in a
similar capacity during the last completed fiscal year. See Regulation
S-B
Item 402 (a)(2)(i). Also, include a row for each such person in your
table
disclosing beneficial ownership of your
stock.
|
Company
Response
We
have
done so.
Director
Compensation, page 39
33.
|
Please
revise to disclose when your directors and members of the Scientific
Advisory Committee will receive the
options.
|
Company
Response
We
have
so disclosed.
Russell
Mancuso
December 1,
2006
Page 10
Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions, page 40
34.
|
We
note your disclosure that most office services are provided by the
president. Revise to disclose the name of the individual who serves
in
this capacity.
|
Company
Response
We
have
indicated that the individual is Dr. Kovach.
35.
|
Tell
us why you have not provided disclosure under Item 404(a) of Regulation
SB
for the commission and fee paid to WestPark Capital, Inc. for its
services
as placement agent in connection with your recent private placements.
We
note that at the time of the transaction, it appears your president,
Mr.
Rappaport, was also CEO of WestPark
Capital.
|
Company
Response
We
have
disclosed the information pertaining to WestPark Capital, Inc.
36.
|
Please
tell us why you have not described in this section the stockholder
advances mentioned on pages 27 and
F-2.
|
Company
Response
We
have
added the disclosure.
37.
|
Please
provide the disclosure required by Item 404(d) of Regulation
S-B.
|
Company
Response
We
have
provided the disclosure.
Description
of Securities, page 40
38.
|
Please
disclose when you split your securities as mentioned at the bottom
of page
2. Also, tell us when shareholders approved the
split.
|
Company
Response
We
have
added the disclosure.
Russell
Mancuso
December 1,
2006
Page 11
39.
|
Please
quantify the amounts required by Regulation S-B Item 201
(a)(2).
|
Company
Response
We
have
made the disclosure.
Selling
Stockholders, page 41
40.
|
Please
revise the selling stockholder table to identify the individuals
who
beneficially own the shares held by the entities named in the
table.
|
Company
Response
We
have
made the revisions.
41.
|
Please
tell us whether any of the selling shareholders are broker-dealers
or
affiliates of broker-dealers.
|
Company
Response
To
our
knowledge, none of the selling shareholders are broker-dealers or their
affiliates.
42.
|
Please
disclose when each selling shareholder acquired the offered shares
and the
consideration paid for those
shares.
|
Company
Response
We
have
made the disclosures.
Financial
Statements, page F-1
43.
|
Please
update your financial statements, as necessary, to comply with Item
310(g)
of Regulation S-B.
|
Company
Response
We
have
updated the financial statements, as necessary, to comply with Item 310(g)
of
Regulation S-B.
44.
|
Please
tell us your basis for incorporating by reference the information
from
your Form 8-K as disclosed on page
F-7.
|
Russell
Mancuso
December 1,
2006
Page 12
Company
Response
SRKP
7,
Inc., a Delaware public shell company, completed a reverse merger transaction
with Lixte Biotechnology, Inc., a privately-held Delaware corporation (“Lixte”),
effective June 30, 2006, whereby Lixte became a wholly-owned subsidiary of
SRKP
7, Inc. Lixte was considered the accounting acquirer in the transaction.
Accordingly, commencing June 30, 2006, the historical financial statements
of
SRKP 7, Inc. consist of the financial statements of Lixte and exclude the
historical financial results of SRKP 7, Inc. prior to that date. SRKP 7, Inc.
was incorporated on May 24, 2005 and was a development stage company with
nominal assets and operations through June 30, 2006. The historical audited
financial statements of Lixte were initially included in the Current Report
on
Form 8-K filed on July 7, 2006. As such, in order to refer the reader to the
most recent audited financial statements (as well as the most recent 2006
interim financial statements) of Lixte, the accounting acquirer, we incorporated
by reference the information from this Current Report on Form 8-K, since that
is
where such financial statements had been previously filed with the SEC.
Interim
Financial Statements for the period ended June 30, 2006
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheet, page F-2
45.
|
There
is no distinction made herein of which liability items are current
or
non-current. Based on the disclosure in MD&A about the amount of
working capital at June 30, 2006, it appears that the research and
development contract liability represents a current liability at
that
date. Please revise your balance sheet to classify liabilities as
either
current or long-term.
|
Company
Response
All
liabilities at June 30, 2006 (as well as at September 30, 2006) were current
liabilities. We have clarified the balance sheet presentation to make it clear
that all liabilities are current liabilities.
Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficiency), page
F-4
46.
|
We
note that the 4,005,177 shares issued in connection with the reverse
merger transaction represent those held by the Company’s stockholders
immediately prior to the share exchange and the value assigned to
these
shares ($62,500) was based on the cash acquired in the transaction.
According to Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, the
Company
only had $3,000 in cash and negative working capital of approximately
$10,000. Please provide us with a summary calculation of how the
amount of
cash acquired on June 30, 2006 was determined and tell us from what
source
it was derived. Also, tell us why you believe your accounting entry
for
the reverse merger was appropriate and compliant with GAAP. Finally,
revise the filing as necessary based on our
comment.
|
Russell
Mancuso
December 1,
2006
Page 13
Company
Response
SRKP
7,
Inc. had approximately $3,000 of cash on March 31, 2006 (see Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, filed on May 15,
2006). On May 17, 2006, SRKP 7, Inc. sold 905,000 shares of its common stock
to
TMC Ulster Holdings, Inc. in a private placement for $100,000 in cash (see
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 8, 2006). During the three months
ended
June 30, 2006, prior to the reverse merger transaction with Lixte Biotechnology,
Inc. effective June 30, 2006, SRKP 7, Inc. disbursed approximately $40,500
as
payment of all corporate obligations, resulting in a cash balance of
approximately $62,500 in SRKP 7, Inc. immediately prior to the reverse merger
transaction. A schedule showing the account balances as of March 31, 2006
rolled forward to the account balances as of June 30, 2006 is attached hereto
as
Exhibit
_.
We
are
advised that the Staff considers reverse acquisitions with non-operating public
shells to be capital transactions in substance, rather than business
combinations. This type of transaction is equivalent to the issuance of stock
by
the private company for the net monetary assets of the shell corporation,
accompanied by a recapitalization (Division of Corporation Finance: Frequently
Requested Accounting and Financial Reporting Interpretations and Guidance -
March 31, 2001 - Topic 1.F.).
The
reverse merger transaction between SRKP 7, Inc. and Lixte Biotechnology, Inc.
was, in substance, a capital transaction, wherein Lixte acquired control of
a
public shell company with $62,500 of cash and no other assets, liabilities
or
operations, in exchange for approximately 4,000,000 shares of common stock
held
by the shareholders of the former public shell (representing approximately
16%
of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of SRKP 7, Inc. at the
closing), who continued only as passive investors. As a result of the reverse
merger transaction, SRKP 7, Inc. is now controlled by the former sole
stockholder of Lixte Biotechnology, Inc.
Accordingly,
for the reasons noted above, we believe our accounting entry for the reverse
merger was appropriate and compliant with GAAP.
Russell
Mancuso
December 1,
2006
Page 14
Note
3. Share Exchange Agreement and Private Placement, page F-11
Private
Placement, page F-12
47.
|
Please
disclose the terms of any registration rights agreements. We note
that
there was no financial penalty associated with these registration
rights.
Please tell us the accounting implications of the rights. Your response
should address how EITF 05-04 impacts your
conclusions.
|
Company
Response
In
conjunction with the private placement of the Company’s common stock, the
Company issued five-year warrants to WestPark Capital, Inc. for placement agent
services, exercisable at the per share price of the common stock sold in the
private placement. The warrants are exercisable into a fixed number of shares
with only standard anti-dilution rights. However, the warrants contain cashless
exercise provisions and demand registration rights. Although the warrant holders
have demand registration rights, the failure to register the shares after the
Company’s best commercial efforts will not result in any cash or other economic
damages to the Company. Accordingly, the Company does not believe that the
demand registration rights result in the warrants becoming a derivative
liability. In
reaching its conclusion, the Company considered the impacts of paragraphs 11a
and 12c of FAS 133 and the discussions included in EITF No. 00-19 (principally
paragraph 4).
Paragraph
1 of EITF No. 05-04 refers to a “… registration rights agreement that
includes
a
liquidated damages clause.” Paragraph 4 of EITF No. 05-04 summarizes this issue
as follows: “The issue is how a liquidated damages clause payable in
cash
affects
the accounting for a freestanding financial instrument subject to the provisions
of Issue [EITF No.] 00-19.” Since the Company has no liquidated damages clause
in its registration rights commitments with WestPark Capital, Inc., the Company
does not believe that EITF No. 05-04 has any impact on its conclusions. The
Company believes that the appropriate accounting for any such damages should
be
recorded as incurred and should not itself be considered as a derivative.
Note
4.
Related Party Transactions, page F-13
48.
|
Please
disclose the terms and conditions of the non-interest bearing advances
made by Lixte’s founding
stockholder.
|
Russell
Mancuso
December 1,
2006
Page 15
Company
Response
The
advances made by Lixte’s founding stockholder are non-interest bearing and are
due on demand. We have clarified the disclosure with respect to these terms
in
the notes to the condensed consolidated interim financial
statements.
Note
6. Commitments and Contingencies, page F-14
49.
|
We
note that on March 22, 2006 you entered into a contract (CRADA) with
the
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services whereupon you agreed
to
provide funds totaling $400,000 over a two-year term. We further
note that
this was recorded as a liability with the related amount of such
contract
recorded as “deferred research and development costs” (i.e., an asset).
Please tell us why you believe you have correctly accounted for this
agreement. Also, tell us how the latter satisfies the definition
of an
asset as described in paragraph 25 of CON6 and why you believe it
was
appropriate to record it as a fixed asset. Reference your response
to the
guidance in CON6 or other applicable authoritative accounting literature.
Also, please include a copy of the agreement as an exhibit to the
filing.
|
Company
Response
The
Company has considered the Staff’s comments and has reviewed CON6, and in
particular, paragraph 25, which states that “Assets are probable future economic
benefits obtained or controlled by a particular entity as a result of past
transactions or events.”
At
June
30, 2006, the Company initially recorded the total amount of the contractual
liability of $400,000 as a current liability, since it was all due and payable
within 12 months of June 30, 2006. The related debit amount of such contract
was
initially recorded as an intangible asset (not a fixed asset) captioned
“deferred research and development costs” and was being amortized ratably over
the life of the contract.
The
contract was effective March 22, 2006, and the first installment of $200,000
was
due and payable within 180 days of such date, with the second installment due
and payable within 30 days of March 22, 2007. Through June 30, 2006, the Company
made a payment of $3,000 related to such obligation, and during the three months
ended September 30, 2006, the Company made a further payment of $197,000 related
to such obligation, for total payments aggregating $200,000 through September
30, 2006.
Russell
Mancuso
December 1,
2006
Page 16
As
a
result of such re-evaluation, at September 30, 2006, the Company decided to
reclassify contractual commitments not yet due until 2007 of $200,000 against
the related asset. Accordingly, the balance sheet at September 30, 2006
reflects only amounts committed and currently due and payable. Such
reclassification did not have any effect on net stockholders' equity, results
of
operations or cash flows.
We
have
filed the agreement as an exhibit to the registration statement being filed
herewith.
Recent
Sales of Unregistered Securities, page II-2
50.
|
Please
provide the disclosure required by Regulation S-B Item 701 for all
securities sold during the past three
years without registration under the Securities
Act.
|
Company
Response
We
have
added the disclosure.
51.
|
Please
disclose the facts relied upon to make the cited exemption from
registration available.
|
Company
Response
We
have
added the disclosure.
Item
28. Undertakings, page II-4
52.
|
Please
include the undertakings required by item 512(a)(4) and 512(g) of
Regulation S-B. Refer to Rule 424(b)(3) and Rule
430C(d).
|
Company
Response
We
have
added the undertakings.
Item
27. Exhibits
53.
|
Please
tell us why you have not filed the Cooperative Research and Development
Agreement as an exhibit.
|
Russell
Mancuso
December 1,
2006
Page 17
Company
Response
We
are
herewith filing the Agreement.
Exhibit
23.2
54.
|
Please
provide an updated consent from your independent accountant in any
amendment.
|
Company
Response
We
have
filed the updated consent.
Signatures
55.
|
Please
indicate below the second paragraph required on the Signatures page
who is
signing the document in the capacity of principal financial officer
and
controller or principal accounting officer. See “Instructions for
signatures” at the end of Form
SB-2.
|
Company
Response
We
have
indicated that Dr. Kovach is the principal financial officer.
Please
address any additional comments or questions to the undersigned at (310)
789-1290.
Sincerely, | |||
/s/ David L. Ficksman | |||
David L. Ficksman | |||
of
|
|||
Troy & Gould |
Exhibit
A
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
SRKP
7, Inc.
-
Rollforward
of Balances from 03/31/06 to 06/30/06
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deficit
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Due
|
Common
|
Additional
|
During
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Accounts
|
To
|
Stock
|
Paid-in
|
Development
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
|
Payable
|
Stockholders
|
($0.001
par)
|
Capital
|
Stage
|
DR(CR)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balances
per 03/31/06 Form 10-QSB
|
$
|
3,035
|
$
|
(400
|
)
|
$
|
(12,500
|
)
|
$
|
(270
|
)
|
$
|
(24,730
|
)
|
$
|
34,865
|
$
|
-
|
|||||||
Activity:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
04/01/06
to 05/11/06
|
Professional
fees paid
|
$
|
(1,400
|
)
|
$
|
400
|
$
|
1,000
|
$
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Other
expenses paid
|
$
|
(427
|
)
|
$
|
427
|
$
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/17/2006
|
Proceeds
from sale of common stock
|
$
|
100,000
|
$
|
(91
|
)
|
$
|
(99,910
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
||||||||||||||
(see
Form 8-K of SRKP 7, Inc. dated May 17, 2006)
|
$
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
$
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
05/30/06
to 06/26/06
|
Professional
fees paid
|
$
|
(4,687
|
)
|
$
|
4,687
|
$
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Other
expenses paid
|
$
|
(713
|
)
|
$
|
713
|
$
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
6/30/2006
|
Shareholder
advances repaid
|
$
|
(12,500
|
)
|
$
|
12,500
|
$
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Professional
fees paid
|
$
|
(19,859
|
)
|
$
|
19,859
|
$
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balances
before reverse merger transfer to Lixte
|
$
|
63,449
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
(361
|
)
|
$
|
(124,640
|
)
|
$
|
61,551
|
$
|
-
|
|||||||||
6/30/2006
|
Transfer
to Lixte
|
$
|
(62,500
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
after reverse merger transfer to Lixte
|
$
|
949
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(subsequently
disbursed in payment of filing fees & bank charges)
|